Alaa El-Hussuna |
Optimisation is the action of making the best or most effective use of a situation or resource (Oxford Dictionary) but in the medical world it is preparing the patient (and the surgeon) for surgery and postoperative recovery.
The goal of “optimising” patients’ health prior to surgery is to minimise the risk of postoperative complications, decrease the length of hospital stay, reduce unplanned re-admissions and enhance overall health and surgical experience.
The IBD team
Optimising the IBD team is the first step in preparing patients. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) is the most appropriate to manage patients with IBD because of the heterogeneity of the disease, the complexity of management and the chronic nature of IBD. Unfortunately, many tertiary centres in developed countries still lack MDT-planned management despite the strong evidence to support it.
Good pre-operative radiological diagnostic imaging is also mandatory to assess the patient and plan the operation. Surgical intervention, whether it is resection, stoma construction or strictureplasty etc., is only one station on the long path usually travelled by patients. Surgical intervention must therefore be integrated with other treatment modalities. This is best achieved by a dedicated IBD surgeon.
How to optimise the patient for surgical intervention
A bundle of pre-operative measures will optimise the patient for surgical intervention and improve postoperative outcomes. This bundle includes:
Challenges in pre-operative optimisation
How many centres offer such a bundle of pre-operative measures to patients? Even if we consider only tertiary centres in developed countries, pre-operative optimisation is still limited. There are several reasons for this failure:
Evidence to support optimisation
The above-mentioned pre-operative optimisation bundle and the evidence to support it has been discussed in detail in a recent ECCO Topical Review [1]. However, to the author’s knowledge, to date no study has examined the effect of the different elements when applied together in one bundle. This reflects the challenges faced by research into postoperative outcomes in IBD. The heterogeneity of the disease, the complexity and multidisciplinary nature of management and sample size issues make it difficult to conduct a well-designed research project, leaving aside the difficulty in raising funds for such a research project.
Source: Courtesy of Alaa El-Hussuna
In Figure 1 we suggest a model to tackle these challenges. The Ziggurat figure is composed of five stages. The first is the identification of appropriate research questions addressing gaps in our knowledge. Then, a study design must be adopted that encourages collaborative prospective studies and randomised controlled trials by a multidisciplinary IBD research team. After implementation of the research project and assessment of the results, new research may be planned in a wise reiteration of the process. Involvement of the medical industry may be considered to enhance funding and dissemination of knowledge, while engagement of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) will improve the generalisability of the research and ensure wider adoption of the recommendations.
New tools for IBD research
Traditional research cannot answer an increasing number of research questions. There is a need to explore and develop new tools for medical research that implement advances in information technologies such as computer simulation models, artificial intelligence, crowd science, big data mining, and synthetic and augmented data analyses, to name just a few.
A group of international researchers have joined forces to explore, develop, validate and disseminate these new tools of research within the framework of a non-profit, international research organisation, the Open Source Research Collaboration (osrc.network). The author is the founder and current chairperson of this organisation.
These new tools may help in generating the required evidence. LMICs can participate in research projects which make use of mobile phone applications due to the ubiquitous use of mobile phones in LMICs.
Conclusion
There are many challenges that prevent or limit the implementation of pre-operative optimisation in patients with IBD. Raising awareness of these challenges, improving the funding for IBD research and lobbying by patients’ associations will encourage adaptation and development of pre-operative optimisation.
Let’s do it – today!