EpiCom Interview with Gilaad G. Kaplan and Siew C. Ng, co-leaders of the GIVES-21 Research Group
ResCom Member
This interview addresses aspects of the important recent study entitled “Global evolution of inflammatory bowel disease across epidemiologic stages”, which was published in Nature earlier this year [Hracs L, Windsor JW, Gorospe J, et al.; Global IBD Visualization of Epidemiology Studies in the 21st Century (GIVES-21) Research Group. Nature 2025;642: 458–66. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08940-0].
Why did you decide to conduct this study? How did you build this consortium and obtain the required information?

Gilaad G. Kaplan; Siew C. Ng © Siew C. Ng
Our collaboration began over a decade ago, when Dr. Kaplan’s lab at the University of Calgary, which was focused on studying the epidemiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) in the Western world, teamed up with Dr. Siew Ng’s lab at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, which was studying IBD epidemiology in Asia. This partnership led to our first major global epidemiology study, published in The Lancet in 2017. That work sparked a new initiative, supported by the International Organization for the Study of IBD (IOIBD) and funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust, to establish the Global Visualization of Epidemiology in the 21st Century consortium—GIVES-21.
GIVES-21 has two major platforms. One, led by Dr. Ng, has developed inception cohorts across Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America, which are regions where IBD epidemiology data have historically been sparse. The other, led by Dr. Kaplan’s lab, focuses on advanced analytical approaches that synthesise all available epidemiologic data on IBD incidence and prevalence worldwide—drawing both on the literature and on the new inception cohorts—to track and model global trends in the evolution of IBD over time.
The collective work of the GIVES-21 consortium formed the foundation for the study that was ultimately published in Nature.
Your study gathered and analysed data spanning more than a century and covering 82 global regions. What were the most significant trends you observed regarding the evolution of the incidence and prevalence of IBD worldwide, particularly in newly industrialised regions?
Our study charts the remarkable transformation of IBD from a rare condition in Western countries a century ago to a global health issue affecting millions today. As part of the GIVES-21 initiative, we analysed data from over 500 population-based studies spanning more than 80 regions and 100 years.
We discovered that IBD spreads in a predictable, four-stage pattern. In stage 1, IBD is rare, with only isolated cases—similar to what we see in parts of Africa today. Stage 2 is marked by a rapid increase in new diagnoses each year, although prevalence remains low, as seen in newly industrialised regions such as Hong Kong. Stage 3 occurs when incidence stabilises but the number of people living with IBD continues to rise sharply; Western countries, including Canada, are in this stage. Finally, stage 4 is defined by the stabilisation of prevalence as the population with IBD ages.
By defining this framework, we provide governments, healthcare systems and patient communities with a roadmap to anticipate and prepare for the rising burden of IBD worldwide—particularly in regions currently entering the rapid-growth stage.
Your findings show that, in many early industrialised regions, the prevalence of IBD continues to rise despite a stabilisation or decrease in incidence. What do you think are the primary factors contributing to this ongoing increase in prevalence in these areas?
Early industrialised regions are in stage 3 of the IBD evolution framework—what we call compounding prevalence. In this stage, incidence (the number of new diagnoses each year) has stabilised, but prevalence (the total number of people living with the disease) continues to rise sharply. This happens because IBD is a chronic, incurable condition that is often diagnosed in young adults and has low mortality. As a result, gastroenterology clinics continually add new patients but rarely remove them from their registries. As long as new diagnoses outnumber deaths, prevalence will keep increasing.
An important consequence of compounding prevalence is that the IBD population is aging. Seniors are now the fastest-growing demographic with IBD. This is happening for two reasons: first, gastroenterologists are diagnosing new cases in older adults—including those over 60; second, people diagnosed decades ago are living longer with the disease. For example, someone diagnosed with Crohn’s Disease in their 30s in the 1990s will be in their 70s by 2030. An aging IBD population faces additional challenges, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease and other age-related comorbidities, which make management more complex and costly.
Our work aims to highlight not only the rising prevalence of IBD but also its changing demographics, so that health systems and providers can prepare for the future burden of caring for an older, more medically complex IBD population.
And what is the current situation in developed countries based on your findings?
Most developed countries, including the United States, Canada, Western Europe and Australia, are currently in stage 3, moving toward stage 4, whereby incidence has stabilised but prevalence remains at record highs due to the chronic nature of IBD and low mortality. The IBD population is aging rapidly, which will eventually stabilise the prevalence, but gastroenterologists and surgeons will need to contend with managing the complexities of older adults with comorbidities such as cancer and metabolic and cardiovascular diseases.
According to your analysis, which regions are projected to experience the largest increases in IBD burden over the coming decades, and what healthcare system implications should local authorities anticipate as a result?
Our Nature paper shows that while IBD was once concentrated in Western countries, it began spreading globally in the early 2000s. Since then, rates have been rising in Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and parts of Africa. This spread follows a predictable pattern, often linked to rapid industrialisation and urbanisation. Environmental changes that accompany modernisation, such as dietary shifts, reduced microbial exposure in early life, increased antibiotic use and pollution, are likely key drivers. At the same time, economic growth brings stronger healthcare infrastructure, leading to greater awareness, better diagnostic tools and more cases being detected. Our four-stage framework provides a roadmap to help countries anticipate and prepare for the growing burden of IBD as part of the broader impact of modernisation:
- Developing countries (stage 1): Developing countries, such as most nations in Africa, are currently in stage 1 of the IBD evolution framework, where only low rates of the disease are detected. However, with economic growth, expanding healthcare infrastructure and the westernisation of diets and lifestyles, incidence is expected to rise steadily throughout the 21st century. The key challenges in these regions will be timely recognition of IBD, training of healthcare professionals and strengthening of healthcare systems to meet the needs of a growing patient population. ECCO now has a unique opportunity to form partnerships with stage 1 developing countries to help prepare for, and mitigate, the expanding burden of IBD anticipated in these regions.
- Newly industrialised countries (stage 2): Regions in Asia and Latin America are experiencing a rapid rise in incidence, while prevalence remains low. If they follow Western patterns, they will transition into stage 3 within the next decade, leading to a sharp increase in prevalence.
- Western countries (stage 3, moving toward stage 4): Incidence has stabilised, but prevalence remains at record highs due to the chronic nature of IBD and low mortality. The IBD population is aging rapidly, which will eventually stabilise prevalence, but gastroenterologists will need to contend with managing the complexities of older adults with comorbidities such as cancer and cardiovascular disease.
And finally, what can we learn for the future?
The key lesson from our study is that IBD follows a predictable epidemiologic path, and knowing where a country sits within the four-stage framework gives governments and healthcare systems a critical head start. This knowledge can guide tailored strategies, whether that’s building diagnostic capacity in regions where IBD is emerging, training specialists in places where incidence is climbing rapidly or developing care models for older adults in countries with long-established disease.
Looking ahead, two priorities stand out. First, we need greater investment in prevention-focused research to better understand the environmental and lifestyle factors driving IBD, so that we can modify these risks and slow the spread of the disease globally. Second, we must strengthen healthcare systems—from infrastructure and workforce development to ensuring equitable access to effective treatments—so that every person with IBD, regardless of where they live, can receive timely and high-quality care.