Y-ECCO Literature Review: John Thomas
The IL-22–oncostatin M axis promotes intestinal inflammation and tumorigenesis
Cineus R, Luo Y, Saliutina M, et al.
Nature Immunology 2025;26:837–53. doi: 10.1038/s41590-025-02149-z
Introduction
The pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is characterised by dysregulated cytokine networks, which orchestrate intercellular communication between immune, stromal and epithelial compartments [1]. The traditional dogma in IBD posited that Th1-mediated responses (involving IL-2, IL-12 and IFNγ) predominated in Crohn’s Disease (CD), whereas excessive Th2-mediated responses (involving IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13) prevailed in Ulcerative Colitis (UC) [2]. Mounting evidence that multiple cytokines contribute to both forms of IBD has now dispelled this paradigm. For instance, the efficacy of ustekinumab (anti-IL-12/23p40), which targets Th1 and Th17 responses, in both UC [3] and CD [4] underscores shared cytokine signalling mechanisms.
Within this evolving landscape, oncostatin M (OSM), a member of the IL-6 cytokine family [5], recently emerged as a key pathogenic cytokine. In 2017, West and colleagues showed that OSM is highly expressed in inflamed colonic mucosa of IBD patients compared with controls and that elevated mucosal OSM predicts resistance to anti-TNF therapy [6]. They demonstrated that OSM is produced by CD4+ T cells and HLA-DR+ antigen-presenting cells, while its receptor (OSMR) is expressed mainly on non-haematopoietic stromal cells. These findings suggested that immune–stromal signalling driven by OSM underpins anti-TNF resistance in IBD.
In the study addressed in this literature review, Cineus and colleagues considerably advance our understanding of OSM biology through integrative experiments spanning murine models, organoids and human expression data.
Methods and key findings
First, the authors characterised shifts in Osm and Osmr expression during intestinal inflammation using two murine models: the Helicobacter hepaticus plus anti-IL-10 receptor model and Citrobacter rodentium infection. They found that both Osm and Osmr were rapidly induced at colitis onset and remained persistently elevated. While Osm was broadly expressed across haematopoietic populations in healthy mice, production shifted to inflammatory monocytes, neutrophils and dendritic cells in colitic mice. Osmr, largely confined to stromal cells in the non-inflamed state, showed a modest but significant increase in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) during colitis, where expression correlated with histological severity. Human intestinal biopsies also revealed elevated epithelial OSMR expression in IBD patients compared with non-IBD controls.
To interrogate the functional effects of Osmr during colitis, the authors employed a series of elegant, reductionist experiments in mice using conditional deletion strategies to selectively ablate Osmr expression in epithelial, stromal and endothelial compartments. Strikingly, conditional deletion of Osmr in IECs, but not in stromal or endothelial cells, ameliorated colitis, suggesting that epithelial OSM signalling plays a critical role in propagating inflammation in colitis. This is a notable departure from the previous emphasis on OSM signalling between immune–stromal compartments.
Having identified a pathogenic role for epithelial OSM signalling in colitis, the authors next investigated its upstream regulation. Using murine colonic epithelial organoids, they systematically tested cytokines and other inflammatory stimuli, identifying IL-22 as the most potent inducer of Osmr in IECs. This corroborated with positive correlations observed between OSMR expression in four independent IBD patient cohorts and a recently characterised IL-22-responsive gene signature derived from human colonic epithelial organoids [7]. In vivo experiments involving IL-22 knockout mice, wild-type mice treated with IL-22 neutralising antibodies and IEC-specific IL-22 receptor knockouts all exhibited impaired OSMR induction and attenuated colitis. Further mechanistic dissection revealed that IL-22 acted via STAT3, as IECs deficient in Stat3 failed to upregulate Osmr upon IL-22 stimulation. Group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) were identified as the primary source of IL-22 in the inflamed colon, with IL-23 inhibition reducing IL-22 production, epithelial Osmr expression and disease activity. The functional consequences of OSMR activation in IECs were subsequently explored. IEC-specific Osmr deficiency blunted STAT3 phosphorylation, reduced inflammatory gene expression and limited immune infiltration. These findings demonstrated a pathogenic IL-23–IL-22–OSMR–STAT3 axis, linking ILC3-derived cytokine signals to colonic epithelial inflammatory responses.
Finally, Cineus and colleagues investigated OSMR in colitis-associated cancer (CAC). OSMR was highly expressed in tumour epithelial and stromal cells but absent from adjacent normal tissue both in the azoxymethane/dextran sodium sulphate (AOM/DSS) model of CAC and in human CAC samples. Genetic deletion of Osm reduced tumour burden, as did anti-OSM therapy or IEC-specific Osmr ablation after tumour initiation. Anti-OSM therapy also decreased STAT3 phosphorylation in adenomas. Blockade of IL-22 or IL-12/23 reduced Osmr expression in adenoma epithelial cells, while IL-12/23 inhibition also lowered Il22 expression. Collectively, these findings unveiled the IL-23–IL-22–OSMR–STAT3 axis as both a mediator of inflammation and a promoter of CAC tumorigenesis.
Discussion
This study provides deeper insights into cytokine signalling in IBD. It demonstrates that OSMR expression in the epithelial, rather than stromal, compartment is a key driver of colitis. Together with earlier findings, this suggests that OSM–OSMR signalling may operate through distinct circuits: immune–stromal interactions contributing to treatment resistance and immune–epithelial interactions primarily driving inflammation and CAC. By linking OSM to the IL-23–IL-22–STAT3 pathway, the study also unites two previously separate cytokine networks, highlighting the multifaceted immune interconnections underpinning colitis.
The study also implies that therapeutic inhibition of OSM signalling could attenuate inflammation and treatment resistance, while also mitigating CAC risk. Thus, established anti-IL-23 therapies such as ustekinumab, risankizumab and mirikizumab could disrupt the IL-23–IL-22–OSMR–STAT3 axis and offer dual benefits for disease control and cancer prevention, but the latter has yet to be demonstrated in clinical studies.
Several questions remain. It is unclear whether OSMR is a direct driver of CAC or whether tumour development reflects chronic inflammation per se, such that targeting other cytokines might also yield comparable chemoprevention. The relationship between immune-stromal and immune-epithelial OSM circuits and their upstream drivers also requires further characterisation. Since IL-22-responsive epithelial gene programmes (including OSMR) are enriched in UC patients who fail ustekinumab [7], the IL-22–OSM axis may also contribute to therapeutic resistance. However, given IL-22’s dual role in intestinal barrier repair and inflammation [8], targeting OSM could also inadvertently impair protective epithelial regeneration.
Finally, redundancy within cytokine networks adds another layer of complexity, as compensatory pathways may limit the efficacy of cytokine blockade. This is exemplified by the recent failure of the anti-OSMRβ antibody vixarelimab in a phase II trial in UC [9], which was prematurely halted for lack of efficacy. These findings underscore both the promise and the challenges of translating OSM biology into effective therapies for IBD.
Conclusion
This study sheds new light on the pathogenic role of OSM in IBD. It identifies epithelial OSMR as a critical driver of colitis and CAC, mechanistically linking it to the IL-23–IL-22–STAT3 axis. Collectively, this positions OSMR as a promising therapeutic target in both IBD and CAC, but future research is needed to enable clinical translation. Determining when and how to target OSMR within the intricate cytokine milieu of IBD will be key to harnessing its therapeutic potential.
References
- Friedrich M, Pohin M, Powrie F. Cytokine networks in the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Immunity 2019;50:992–1006.
- Di Sabatino A, Biancheri P, Rovedatti L, MacDonald TT, Corazza GR. New pathogenic paradigms in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18:368–71.
- Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, et al. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1201–14.
- Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Gasink C, et al. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1946–60.
- Rose TM, Bruce AG. Oncostatin M is a member of a cytokine family that includes leukemia-inhibitory factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and interleukin 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:8641–5.
- West NR, Hegazy AN, Owens BMJ, et al. Oncostatin M drives intestinal inflammation and predicts response to tumor necrosis factor-neutralizing therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Med 2017;23:579–89.
- Pavlidis P, Tsakmaki A, Pantazi E, et al. Interleukin-22 regulates neutrophil recruitment in ulcerative colitis and is associated with resistance to ustekinumab therapy. Nat Commun 2022;13:5820.
- Klotskova HB, Kidess E, Nadal AL, Brugman S. The role of interleukin‐22 in mammalian intestinal homeostasis: Friend and foe. Immun Inflamm Dis 2024;12:e1144.
- Neighbors M, Hains A, Rhee H, et al. P0929 Design and rationale for the phase 1c study evaluating the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of vixarelimab in patients with Ulcerative Colitis (UC). J Crohns Colitis 2025;19:i1743–4.
Profile
John Thomas is a Gastroenterology Specialist Registrar and Chain-Florey Clinical Research Fellow at the MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences and Imperial College London. He is interested in harnessing multi-omics data and human organoid models for advancing precision medicine in IBD.