P293 Loss of response after first-line biologic therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: practical approach and management
A. Busacca, B. Scrivo, E. Giuffrida, L. Guida, L. Carrozza, V. Calvaruso, M. Cappello
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Background
Anti-tumour necrosis factors (anti-TNFs) have greatly improved therapeutic strategies for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). However, a significant number of patients do not respond or lose response over time (LOR). The aim of this retrospective prospective study was to evaluate patients (patients) treated with anti-TNFs as first-line treatment, with subsequent LOR, defined as recurrence of disease activity during maintenance therapy. We determine the prevalence of LOR and its management.
Methods
Three-hundred forty patients with IBDs were included: 65% had Crohn’s disease and 35% ulcerative colitis. Mean age at diagnosis was 31,5 years and medium time between diagnosis and start of biologic treatment was 72 months. Among 300 patients treated with anti-TNFs, LOR occurred in 33%, 38% was in treatment with Infliximab, 55% with Adalimumab, and 7% with Golimumab and it was statistically related with smoke (
Results
Among patients with LOR, 88% had a persistent clinical activity, evaluated by clinical scores (HBI and pMayo score) and 56% had a persistent endoscopic activity, evaluated by endoscopic scores (SES-CD and Mayo). After the LOR, 56% of patients optimised treatment for medium time of 7,8 month, 31% switched to another Anti-TNF, 7% swapped to a different class of biologics (Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab) and 4% had surgery as a treatment strategy. During treatment with anti-TNF as second-line treatment, LOR occurred in 17 patients. Anti-TNFs was the third line therapy in 3 patients, while Vedolizumab in 13. Only 2 patients in treatment with Vedolizumab had a second LOR and started Ustekinumab.
Conclusion
Loss of response occurred frequently in patients treated with biologics. Optimisation of treatment was not efficacious during a long period and the use of another biologic (anti-TNF or another class) is the more suitable strategy in our centre, with success in 35% of patients who lose response.