P430 Feasibility and reliability of gastrointestinal ultrasound in pregnant inflammatory bowel disease patients
F. de Voogd1, H. Joshi2, E. Van Wassenaer1, G. D’Haens1, K. Gecse1
1Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2Gastroenterology, Sir H N Reliance Hospital, Mumbai, India
Background
Disease activity during pregnancy in women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with miscarriage, preterm delivery and low birth weight. Monitoring disease activity throughout the pregnancy is therefore important. Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) has a high potential as a point-of-care tool for monitoring disease activity in IBD as it has been shown to correlate well with endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. However, data are scarce on the use of GIUS in IBD throughout pregnancy. The aim of this prospective study is to determine the feasibility and reliability of GIUS in pregnant IBD patients.
Methods
Patients were included when visiting the outpatient IBD pregnancy clinic. At each trimester, clinical and biochemical disease activity was evaluated and GIUS was performed. Feasibility was assessed by the ability to visualise each bowel segment (terminal ileum (TI), ascending (AC), transverse (TC), descending (DC) and sigmoid colon (SC)). Reliability was evaluated by using clinical and biochemical disease activity as a gold standard. This was defined as a Harvey–Bradshaw Index ≥4 in Crohn’s disease (CD) or a Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index ≥5 in ulcerative colitis and a faecal calprotectin (FCP)³ 250 mg/g. Bowel wall thickness (BWT) of > 3 mm in the colon and > 2mm in the terminal ileum was considered as signs of active inflammation on ultrasound. A Mann–Whitney
Results
Thirty-two IBD patients (54% CD) were studied. Both a GIUS and FCP was available in 18, 11 and 6 patients for the first, second and third trimester, respectively. Eleven of 32 (34%) patients had clinically active disease at least at one time point during the pregnancy. Table 1 shows the visibility per segment. When the active disease was defined as an FCP ≥ 250 mg/g, GIUS could distinguish active from the non-active disease in the first, second and third trimester with a sensitivity of 80%, 75% and 75% and specificity of 85%, 86% and 100%, respectively.
FCP levels were significantly higher in patients with an active disease on GIUS regardless of the trimester (mean 1095.5 ± 1453.8 mg/g vs. 265.25 ± 649.8 mg/g,
| TI | AC | TC | DC | SC | |
| Trimester 1 | 85% | 95% | 95% | 100% | 95% |
| Trimester 2 | 45% | 95% | 95% | 90% | 70% |
| Trimester 3 | 22% | 89% | 100% | 100% | 45% |
Conclusion
GIUS is accurate to distinguish active from the quiescent disease in pregnancy. Feasibility to visualise the TI and the SC decreased during the second and third trimester, although active disease could still be detected. Consequently, GIUS is feasible and reliable to assess disease activity throughout pregnancy in IBD.