P531 A retrospective audit of the inflammatory bowel disease specialist nurse-led telephone advice service
C. Watters, W. Lloyd, M. Porteous, M. Mohamed, S. Kari, E. Nelson, R. Saravanan
Department of Gastroenterology, Silk House, Macclesfield District General Hospital, Macclesfield, UK
Background
Inflammatory bowel disease affects more than 300 000 people in the UK. The aims of the audit were to review the current use of a telephone service provided by the IBD specialist nursing team in a DGH with a view to better funding and further development of the facility.
Methods
The letters generated from each phone call between January and February 2018 were collected and a sample assessed for outcomes directly related to the consultation. Outcomes were subtyped into a change in medical treatment, referral for investigation, referral to another specialist or arrangement of an urgent clinic appointment or hospital admission. Each phone consultation was also assessed as to whether it had avoided an attendance to the GP or hospital via A&E or acute medicine.
Results
The two-month period yielded 491 phone calls, of which 100 letters were reviewed of which 56 (56%) had ulcerative colitis (UC), 44 (44%) had Crohn’s disease (CD). Male users comprised 36% (vs. 64% females) and the age of callers ranged from 19 to 84 years (median age 44 years). Of the UC patients, 45 patients (80.4%) had been diagnosed over 2 years previously with two (3.6%) having been diagnosed within the preceding 3 months (CD patients 34 (77.3%) >2 years previously and three (6.8%) within the last 3 months). The phone consultations led to a change in medication in 49 cases (49%). Phlebotomy and/or faecal calprotectin testing was requested for 59 patients (59%) following the phone call and a further 17 (17%) were discussed with a consultant, although only 8 (8%) required an IBD nurse-led or gastroenterology consultant-led clinic (six and two patients, respectively). Nine patients (9%) went on to have cross-sectional imaging or ultrasound with contrast and 7 (7%) were referred for endoscopic assessment. The overall complexity of the consultation was assessed by the number of services referred to/requested. Thirty-four patients (34%) merely required reassurance or verbal advice whereas two cases (2%) led to five distinct referrals or investigation requests (one service 33 (33%), two service 20 (20%), three service 9 (9%), four service 3 (3%)). Each phone call was assessed as to whether it had likely avoided attendance elsewhere. This included general practice (25 cases (25%)), accident and emergency (2 (2%)), IBD nurse clinic appointment (41 (41%)) or consultant clinic appointment (6 (6%)).
Conclusion
(1) Our audit shows that the IBD nurse-led telephone service is extremely demanding, with a large volume of calls. (2) Remote management of patients could be facilitated by the telephone nurse-led hotline advice service leading to a reduction in healthcare costs, avoiding face-to-face consultations and managing patients as per their personalised needs.