P615 Safety of vedolizumab in the treatment of IBD in a single tertiary centre
G. Peruzzi, L. Calandrini, H. Privitera Hrustemovic, M. Salice, A. Decorato, A. Carbone, F. Rizzello, A. Belluzzi, E. Scaioli, C. Calabrese, P. Gionchetti
Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche Intestinali Prof. Gionchetti, Bologna, Italy
Background
There is a lot of data on Vedolizumab efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Despite this, we have little real-world data on its adverse reactions. We aimed to identify and quantify principal adverse reactions in order to assess the safety of the drug.
Methods
UC and CD patients from a single tertiary IBD referral centre receiving Vedolizumab treatment between September 2016 and August 2019 were included. Data were collected prospectively at week 22, 54 and 108. Adverse events were categorised as infections, rheumatic/cutaneous disorders, allergy-related symptoms/anaphylactic shock, serious adverse events and drug discontinuation. Serious adverse events were those that resulted in hospitalisation or death. Discontinuation was due to drug-related effects or IBD complications that persisted despite the treatment or that could be worsened by drug-induced immunodepression.
Results
Our analysis comprised 200 patients (86 with UC and 114 with CD: 22% female; median age 58,3 years). Adverse effects were reported in 59/200 (29,5%) patients, leading to treatment discontinuation in 21/200 (10,5%) cases: 2 with UC and 19 with CD. Six patients experienced more the one adverse reaction for a total of 69. Rheumatic disorders were observed in 17/69 (24,6%), infections in 17/69 (24,6%) and cutaneous manifestations in 6/69 (8,7%). One patient complained of headache and another subocclusive symptom. One patient had an asymptomatic increase in cholestasis tests. No anaphylactic shock or allergy-related symptoms were reported while 6 patients (6/69, 8,7%) required hospitalisation (especially for infective complications). Vedolizumab discontinuation was due to perianal disease onset or relapse (9/21, 42,8%), infections (6/21, 28,6%) and rheumatic disorders (5/21, 23,8%); in one case we observed uncontrolled hypertension and Ménière syndrome. Treatment was restarted after surgical management and treatment with antibiotics in 3 patients with perianal disease and 1 with community-acquired pneumonia, respectively.
Conclusion
In our experience, Vedolizumab is a well-tolerated drug. Most of the adverse events that occurred in our centre were mild and did not require hospitalisation. In some patients discontinuation was not permanent: we performed it in order to treat the condition that contraindicated the administration and restart treatment.